|11 Ky.L.Rptr. 731, 89 Ky. 529|
|Court of Appeals of Kentucky.|
|REEDER v. REEDER.|
|February 8, 1890.|
Appeal from circuit court, Knox county.
"To be officially reported."
Action for breach of contract to support a grantor in consideration of his deed to land.
The written agreement between appellant and appellee is to the effect that the appellant conveyed to the appellee the appellant's tract of land, and, as is alleged and not denied, put the appellee in the possession of it. The conveyance, as is alleged, was made in consideration of $50 cash, and $450 to be discharged by appellee doing, or causing to be done, the appellant's and his wife's (the latter being now dead) cooking and washing during the life of each; also, the appellee was to furnish the appellant and his wife "a part of a reasonable support;" also, he was to give them, in case of sickness, care and attention, etc.
It was evidently contemplated by the parties that this support, attention, etc., should continue during the life of each, and that the price of the land would be ample pay for such services. It is alleged that the appellee failed to render any of the services, or to pay any part of said sum of money. On the contrary, it is alleged the appellee refused to render any part of said services, or to pay any part of said money, and drove the appellant away from his house. The services that the appellee was to render were to continue during the respective lives of the appellant and his wife, that is, the undertaking was entire; and upon the failure of the appellee to comply with the contract the appellant could have recovered damages for the non-performance during his entire life. The damages accruing to the time of the trial, by reason of the fact that the appellant's health, condition, and necessities could be accurately surveyed, could be easily ascertained by a jury. Also, the damages thereafter, taking into account the appellant's age, health, and condition, and consequent duration of life, are not too conjectural to be passed on by a jury. We have an instance of the kind in the ascertainment of the money value of a life-estate by means of the life-table, etc. But such damage is always speculative or conjectural. Life may be shorter or longer than anticipated. The party's physical health may become more feeble or more robust than anticipated, or his mind may become impaired, etc. These changes of conditions may render the damages asserted very excessive, or grossly inadequate. For these reasons, the party aggrieved should be forced to resort to such measure of compensation, only in the absence of a more certain measure. If a more certain measure is at hand, the party aggrieved should, at his election, be permitted to resort to it. Here, as the appellee has refused to comply with his part of the contract, and as he can return the consideration, and thus the appellant and he will be placed in statu quo, the chancellor, at the election of the appellant, should not hesitate to do it.
The judgment is reversed, with directions for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REEDER v. REEDER.
12 S.W. 1063, 11 Ky.L.Rptr. 731, 89 Ky. 529
Last Update Tuesday, 18-Dec-2012 01:37:24 EST
Copyright © 2015 by the KYGenWeb Team. All
rights reserved. Copyright of submitted items
belongs to those responsible for their authorship or
creation unless otherwise assigned.